If councils do not fight– if the government gets its way
–more cuts will follow
This
year, some councils, like BROXTOWE, are trying to avoid cutting benefit
entitlements, by increasing charges on various categories of empty properties.
Whilst no-one wants to see properties left uninhabited, there can be many
reasons for empty properties – it is not just big private landlords sitting on
their properties – it can be homes that are unfit for habitation; or properties
that people cannot sell due to the economic crisis.
Limited
funds – Under the Government’s proposals, any increased demand for
CTB e.g. due to job losses or reduced income such as from short time
working, has to come from the pot of
money already allocated by the
government. Greater need means less is available for each recipient and year on
year, councils will be re-assessing their income and expected needs and looking
how to make the savings.
If
the Con-Dem proposals are not stopped, there will be further cuts in the money
allocated by the government each year. Councils will find that if they do not
fight for a properly funded scheme they cannot raise sufficient funds without
making cuts in benefit entitlements.
Increasing
charges is not an alternative to fighting – it reflects
a lack of will of councils to fight for more funding and prepares the way for
cuts. Where available, councils should use reserves to cover any shortfall and
to buy time to build a real campaign for proper council funding.
Councils
must fight now! We need to build a
mass campaign to pressurise them to refuse to pass the cuts on either by
increased charges and/or cuts in benefit entitlement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.